Что думаешь? Оцени!
CategorySonnet 4.5Opus 4.5Opus 4.6ORM (JS)JSNext.js project. The strongest recency shift in the dataset.Prisma79%Drizzle60%Drizzle100%Jobs (JS)JSNext.js project. BullMQ → Inngest shift in newest model.BullMQ50%BullMQ56%Inngest50%Jobs (Python)PythonPython API project (61% extraction rate). Celery collapses in newer models.Celery100%FastAPI BgTasks38%FastAPI BgTasks44%CachingCross-languageCross-language (Redis and Custom/DIY appear in both JS and Python)Redis71%Redis31%Custom/DIY32%Real-timeCross-languageCross-language (SSE, Socket.IO, and Custom/DIY appear across stacks)SSE23%Custom/DIY19%Custom/DIY20%
，推荐阅读Line官方版本下载获取更多信息
During development I encountered a caveat: Opus 4.5 can’t test or view a terminal output, especially one with unusual functional requirements. But despite being blind, it knew enough about the ratatui terminal framework to implement whatever UI changes I asked. There were a large number of UI bugs that likely were caused by Opus’s inability to create test cases, namely failures to account for scroll offsets resulting in incorrect click locations. As someone who spent 5 years as a black box Software QA Engineer who was unable to review the underlying code, this situation was my specialty. I put my QA skills to work by messing around with miditui, told Opus any errors with occasionally a screenshot, and it was able to fix them easily. I do not believe that these bugs are inherently due to LLM agents being better or worse than humans as humans are most definitely capable of making the same mistakes. Even though I myself am adept at finding the bugs and offering solutions, I don’t believe that I would inherently avoid causing similar bugs were I to code such an interactive app without AI assistance: QA brain is different from software engineering brain.
在塔克拉玛干沙漠南缘的新疆于田县阿热勒乡阿热勒村，驻村第一书记陈刚一大早就揣着民情手册走进村民家，认真地把群众的急难愁盼记在本上。